Peer Review Process
The peer review process is an objective system at the core of high-quality scholarly publishing. Our referees play a crucial role in maintaining the standards of the journal. All submitted manuscripts undergo a structured and rigorous peer review procedure.
Initial Manuscript Evaluation
The Editor performs an initial screening of all manuscripts. Exceptional manuscripts may be accepted at this stage. Others meeting minimum criteria are forwarded to at least two subject experts. Authors of rejected manuscripts are informed promptly.
Type of Peer Review
- Single-blind review: Reviewer identity remains anonymous.
- Double-blind review: Both reviewer and author identities are concealed.
- Open review: Identities of both reviewer and author are known.
Reviewer Selection
Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise. Authors may suggest reviewers, but the final selection rests with the editorial board.
Reviewer Reports
- Accept Submission
- Revision Required
- Resubmit for Review
- Resubmit Elsewhere
- Decline Submission
- See Comments
Note: Reviewers evaluate content quality and are not responsible for language editing.
Final Decision
The Editor communicates the final decision along with reviewer comments. The Editor’s decision is final.