Main Article Content
parameters such as bulk density, tapped density, compressibility index, and Hausnerâ€™s ratio values indicate good flow, the percentage of drug content was in the range of 96.4Â±0.97%, and various adhesive evaluation results reveal a good
mucoadhesive property.The barium sulphate loaded tablet possesses strong mucoadhesive property, which was evident from prolonged adhesion in the same location of the stomach up to a period of 10 h, whereas the duration of adhesion found to be comparatively less with other polymers. From the results of in vitro and in vivo adhesive tests and in vitro release study the test agent (Gum) appears to exhibit considerable mucoadhesive property and mean residence time values when compared with tablets of carbopol, HPMC, and Chitosan.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International License [CC BY-NC 4.0], which requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only.
Chien YW. Mucosal drug delivery- In: Novel Drug Delivery Systems;
New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1992. p. 197-228.
Robinson JR, Park K. Bioadhesive polymers as platforms for oral
controlled drug delivery: method to study bioadhesion. Int J Pharm
Warbrick J, Boylan, JC. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology. 3rd
ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1994. p. 133-5.
Rathbone MJ, Hadgraft J. Absorption of drugs from the human oral
cavity. Int J Pharm 1991;74:9-12.
Kumar MT, Paul W, Sharma CP, Kuriachan MA. Bioadhesive, pH
responsive micromatrix for oral delivery of insulin. trends biomater.
Artif Organs 2005;18:198-202.
Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HE. An in vitro investigation of
mucosa adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharm
Chen JL, Cyr GN. Compositions producing adhesion through hydration.
In: Manly RS. Adhesion in Biological Systems. 4th ed. New York:
Academic Press; 1970. p. 163.
Harding SE, Davis SS, Deacon MP, Fiebrig I. Biopolymer bioadhesives.
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 1999;16:41-85.
Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the
next generation. J Pharm Sci 2000;89:850-66.
Smart JD. Drug delivery using buccal adhesive systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1993;11:253-70.
Ben Zion O, Nussinovitch A. Physical properties of hydrocolloid wet
glues, food. Hydrocoll 1997;11:429-42.
Yusuf AA, Ahmed AB. Nutrient Contents of Pride of Barbados (Caesalpinia pulcherrima Linn.) Seeds. Pak J Nutr 2007;6:117-21.
Dominica Botanic Gardens, Roseau, Commonwealth of Dominica, West
Indies, December 2004.
Goodman and Gillmans the Pharmacolocical Basis is of Therapeutics.
th ed. 2001. p. 665.
Kulkarni GT, Gowthamarajan K, Bramhaji Rao G, Suresh B. Granulating
and Binding properties of Mucilages from Asparagus racemosus and
Cassia Sophera in tablets. J Sci Indus Res 2002;61:529-32.
Adikwu MU, Yoshikawa Y, Takada K. Bioadhesive delivery of metformin
using prosopis gum with antidiabetic potential. Biol Pharm Bull
Peh KK, Wong CF. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery:
Swelling, Mechanical, and Bioadhesive Properties. J Pharm Pharmaceut
Rao MY, Bala R, Chary R. Design and evaluation of bioadhesive drug
delivery systems. Indian Drugs 1999;35:558-65.
Smart JD. Drug delivery using buccal adhesive systems. Adv Drug Del
Ching HS, Park H, Kelly P, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive polymers as
platform for oral controlled drug delivery: Synthesis and evaluation
of some swelling water-insoluble bioadhesive polymers. J Pharm Sci
Lenarts V, Gurny R. Bioadhesive drug delivery system. 1st ed. Florida:
CRC Press; 2000. p. 155.